# When To Spell Out Numbers In A Essay

By David Becker

So far we have covered the general differences between MLA and APA styles and reviewed how their rules differ when creating in-text citations and reference list entries. However, a reader asked that we cover another difference between the two styles: how they present numbers, particularly ranges of numbers. I’m happy to oblige!

The two styles have very different rules for when to write numbers as words or numerals. MLA Style spells out numbers that can be written in one or two words (*three*, *fifteen*, *seventy-six*, *one thousand*, *twelve billion*) and to use numerals for other numbers (*2¾*; *584*; *1,001*; *25,000,000*). APA Style, on the other hand, generally uses words for numbers below 10 and numerals for numbers 10 and above.

However, the *MLA Handbook *further notes that science writers frequently use numerals for various kinds of data, such as units of measurement and statistical expressions, regardless of size. This is similar to APA Style’s rules for presenting numerical data (see pages 111–114 in the *Publication Manual *for more detail).

In ranges of numbers, MLA Style includes the entire second number for numbers up to 99 (*1-12*;* 25-29*;* 75-99*) but uses only the last two digits of the second number for larger numbers, unless more are needed (*95-105*; *105-19*; *2,104-08*; *5,362-451*). Ranges of years beginning in 1000 AD have their own rules: If the first two digits of both years are the same, include only the last two digits of the second year (*1955-85*; *2004-09*). Otherwise, both numbers should be fully written out (*1887-1913*; *1998-2008*).

APA Style does not have explicit rules for ranges of numbers, except for when referring to a page range or a range of dates in a reference list entry. Numerous examples in Chapter 7 of the *Publication Manual *show both numbers in a page range being written out in full, regardless of size, and example 23 on page 204 demonstrates the same concept applied to a range of years. These rules relate to APA Style’s emphasis on the importance of specificity and clarity in scientific writing. Thus, a range of numbers (*10–40*; *101–109*; *5,000–5,025*;* 90,013–90,157*) or dates (*1999–2003*; *2009–2012*) should never be abbreviated.

I hope that this post will help those of you transitioning from MLA Style to APA Style the next time you need to include numbers in your research papers. Be sure to also check out our series of posts on numbers and metrication and our FAQ page on when to express numbers as words. If there’s still some residual confusion about numbers or any other difference between the two styles, please comment on this post, drop us a note on Twitter or Facebook, or contact us directly. Your question may be the subject of a future post!

Numbers take up their own planet in the style universe, so let’s explore it one mountain at a time. This post covers the basic rules and the basic exceptions. (They’re like siblings, I tell ya.) After we get the fundamentals out of the way, we can move on to fun subcategories, such as money and measurements!

Here’s a little number warm-up to get your brains up and running.

**Cardinal numbers**: one, 7, forty-one, one hundred nine, 852, three thousand sixty-one**Ordinal numbers**: 1st, seventh, 41st, 109th, eight hundred fifty-second, 3,061st**Arabic numerals**: 1, 7, 41, 109, 852, 3,061**Roman numerals**: I, VII, XLI, CIX, DCCCLII, MMMLXI

The best way to commit these distinctions to your long-term memory is to type them out and make up a string of examples for each. (Trust me.)

The best way to commit these distinctions to your long-term memory is to type them out and make up a string of examples for each. (Trust me.)

The *Associated Press Stylebook* prefers the ambiguous word *figure* to refer to number symbols (e.g., *1*, *2*, *3*), choosing to broadly define numeral as, among other things, “[a] word or group of words” (p. 201). I’m sticking to the definition in AP’s dictionary of choice, *Webster’s New World College Dictionary*—“a figure, letter, or a group of any of these, expressing a number.” *The**Chicago Manual of Style* differentiates numerals from words as well.

## Basic Number Rules (for Nontechnical Copy)

**AP** (p. 203)

**Spell out whole numbers up to (and including) nine**(e.g.,*zero*,*one*,*10*,*96*,*104*).**Spell out casual expressions**:*A picture is worth a thousand words, but a really good one is worth a thousand dollars.*

**Chicago** (9.2-4, 9.8)

**Spell out whole numbers up to (and including) one hundred**(e.g.,*zero*,*one*,*ten*,*ninety-six*,*104*).**Spell out whole numbers up to (and including) one hundred**when followed by*hundred*,*thousand*,*hundred thousand*,*million*,*billion*, and so on (e.g.,*eight hundred*,*12,908*,*three hundred thousand*,*twenty-seven trillion*).**Alternative rule: Spell out whole numbers up to (and including) nine, and use numerals for the rest.**That’s right, you have a choice. Control yourselves or we will make you spell out phone numbers in the 17th edition.

Control yourselves or we will make you spell out phone numbers in the 17th edition.

## Numbers Beginning a Sentence

**AP** (p. 202)

**Spell out numbers that begin a sentence**unless it begins with a year (e.g.,*Twelve drummers*,*The 10 lords a-leaping*,*2011’s quota for off-season holiday references has been filled*).

**Chicago** (9.5)

**Always spell out numbers that begin a sentence**, or reword to avoid unwieldiness. Well, if you think that*Nineteen ninety-one*looks more awesome than*The year 1991*, then go right ahead. [Awkward silence as double bind takes effect]

There is no *and* when you spell out whole numbers (e.g., *one hundred one Dalmatians*, not *one hundred and one Dalmatians*).

## Ordinals

**AP** (p. 202)

**Spell out ordinal numbers up to (and including)**when indicating sequence in time or location (e.g.,*ninth**first kiss*,*11th hour*) but not when indicating sequence in naming conventions (usually geographic, military, or political, e.g.,*9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals*).

**Chicago** (9.6)

**Spell out ordinal numbers up to (and including)**(e.g.,*hundredth**second*,*sixty-first*,*333rd*,*1,024th*).

## A Word About Consistency

**AP** (p. 203)

**If you’re juggling a bunch of numbers**within the same sentence, stick to the rules as stated and you’ll be fine. Breathe.

**Chicago** (9.7)

**If you’re juggling a bunch of numbers**within the same paragraph or series of paragraphs, be flexible with the number style if doing so will improve clarity and comprehension. For example, use one number style for items in one category and another style for another category: “I read four books with more than 400 pages, sixty books with more than 100 pages, and a hundred articles with fewer than 4 pages.”

Now that the basics of number style have been laid out, I bet that you can smell the exceptions 1.1 miles away. [A beat, then exit stage right]

## 0 comments